Corvelva renounces the contribution of the National Order of Biologists

Corvelva renounces the contribution of the National Order of Biologists
(Reading time: 2 - 3 minutes)

We inform you that we have made the decision to return the donation from the National Order of Biologists.

This decision was made for a simple reason, to demonstrate to all those who exploited the ONB donation, that we remember being a small part of the investment for qualitative analyzes on pharmaceutical products, that we parents can proceed on our own.

We do not want to rekindle controversy so we simply note that in recent months no one has solicited the institutions in charge of proving the safety of the drugs we have tested, therefore we acknowledge that the scientific community does not solicit scientific answers, but prefers to use other tools to justify his convictions and continue his defense of our complaint about the alleged non-compliance of pharmaceutical products from private companies.

Too bad, it would have been an excellent opportunity to scientifically demonstrate what they have always claimed, "vaccines are safe and effective drugs, here is the scientific evidence that denies Corvelva", official analyzes in hand. But no, of analysis not even a trace, of requests in this sense not even the shadow, only so much fanfare and fury on those who considered it important to investigate independently and seek the answers that are not given to us.

We take note of living in a country that pretends to be democratic but in fact responds to the requests for clarity and transparency of its citizens by setting in motion the well-known mud machine that serves to silence those who dare to ask and to bury any shadow of dissent or doubt .

Well, overseas this happens, on the same days:

WASHINGTON, DC, February 11, 2019 - In response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, the FDA has admitted, for the first time, that government agencies, including the CDC, recommend vaccines for pregnant women without without that they were licensed by pregnant women by the FDA itself or tested for safety in clinical trials. The lawsuit, filed by Children's Health Defense (CHD) lawyer, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on behalf of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), a vaccine safety defense team, sought all the data from the clinical trials used. by the FDA to approve flu shots in pregnant women. The FDA's concise answer:
"We have no recordings that respond to your requests." CDC data show that women who received some flu shots from 2010 to 2012 had a 7,7 times higher risk of miscarriage than women who didn't receive those vaccines. CDC published the study on Vaccine, but omitted these results from its press release. (

We thank the National Order of Biologists, in the person of its President Dr. Vincenzo D'Anna for the availability and transparency of intent; we also realize that citizens in this country have to deal with it on their own: the scientific community does not allow willing institutions to help them, therefore we do mea culpa for having thought of living in a normal country, with normal media and normal scientists.

We sincerely hope that this will put an end to this ridiculous media fuss and allow us to concentrate on consolidating the preliminary data already published in order to arrive quickly at a fixed point; the polemic end in itself has never interested us, we are looking for scientific evidence using a scientific method, we are convinced that one day also AIFA, ISS and Ema will have to discuss the data that we are carrying, and that day we can perhaps go back to discuss science and non-scientist propaganda.

Corvelva staff